I said on the Unfriended page that Laura as a demon isn't scary, but this 5 year old Unfriended fanboy can't take criticisim on Unfriended, and he did this. He also said I am in a town so sick and twisted and my childhood was gruesome. How is finding something not scary makes me look disgusting? I was right, little kids has invaded this wiki.
I unblocked you because your block wasn't justified. The reason was very weak and Villager was the one who suggested the block; everyone knows he has a grudge on you or something therefore he isn't impartial on the matter.
Seriously, something needs to be done. He blocked me at TFAHW for weak reasons (besides the contreversial pages), thinks everything I do or say is "overreacting," and said he didn't hate me, but he called my profile picture garbage, told me I needed to be blocked, and called me bad names like Emoticon Sucks! and Emotional Asshole.
Just because you said "I will never forgive him for that.". Instead of bashing on him, just ignore him for gods sake. Heck, even a some of users are blaming you for some major reason. 4 Users are blaming you. Portrock1566, Acapal8893, Kaynedenny (possibly) and Cartoonfan303 (possibly).
Good call, Mr 222 Guy. Also, it is hard to ignore Villager if he always goes bullying him whenever the chance arises. If there is someone who should leave someone be, it is Villager.
I thought he was an okay user until he wrote a horrible message to the sockpuppeter on Awesome Games Wiki. That message was full of hate, cyberbullying at its worst and something I never saw from Villager before.
Since Villager is one of the most recurrent users on our wikis, that time I decided to delete his thread and I simply scolded him (that stuff was honestly a reason for a global permaban, doesn't matter if the target was that extremely annoying user) but I am noticing that he really became aggressive and without even a reason (at least he had a reason to act like that with the sockpuppeter) over time.
Why did you get rid of it? It's not on greatest movies, it was deleted there. And what kind of reason is "it was made by a hater?" It had 20 solid reasons, and was covering a box-office bomb (lost $50-80 million) with mediocre critic ratings (the lowest since the Prequels) that's caused the suspension of part of a franchise. By any metric you can use, the film is a disaster.
On Ghostbusters 2016, the editing is horrible. The movie was advertised in CinemaScope, but the green screen effects are lazily plastered on for 16:9 Widescreen. I fact, there is a scene in 16:9, which shows the editors are lazy.
Masson Thief wrote:
It seems you are extremely easy at criticizing other people. You are not supposed to act like this when you spot a flaw in a page. Just report the mistake without judging other users.
Wait a minute, I was talking about the editors from the movie, not the page. I was just asking for him/her to add a bad quality about its editing due to the movie being advertised as CinemaScope but the green screen effects being 16:9 Widescreen. I wasn't talking about the editors of the page, or the flaws of the same page.